Insights/Industry/Government Contractors

Agency Novation Plus Article 9: What Partner Banks Diligence

Assignments and novations only help contractor finance if they still point at a controlled original; federal agency process does not replace UCC § 9-105. Pair both, keep change orders on the same package, and give partner banks TOLEC-ready evidence.

Safeclose TeamGovernment Contractors

Your contractor finance sits at the intersection of receivables, equipment, change orders, partner banks, and agency novation. A novation exhibit that still points at last quarter’s shared folder is paperwork without custody. Contractors who keep the country running, and the banks who fund them, need American chattel infra that survives a partner-bank diligence request.

In a § 9-330 contest, the partner bank needs facts about who controlled the electronic original when rights moved. Risk and liability protection is that fact pattern, not a cover letter. You can prove who holds the original. The partner bank does not rebuild from the contracts group’s inbox.

Agency Process and Article 9 Together

Federal assignment and novation process does not displace state UCC control of electronic chattel paper. ESIGN may validate signatures on contractor-facing instruments. Section 9-105 still decides whether the bank has control of an authoritative electronic copy. Default UCC9 compliant custody is what makes the novation exhibit match the asset on the bank’s books.

Alston & Bird’s 2022 overview of Article 9 revisions is the practitioner summary contractor finance counsel already circulates. It flags how bundled transactions and § 9-105 updates matter when several instruments travel together through a novation.

  • Build novation exhibits from vault custody, not from the contracts group’s memory
  • Tie compliance exports to the controlled original
  • Keep change orders on the same package the bank funded

What Partner Banks Should Receive

A static dump is stale when it leaves the vault. Partner banks need identity-confirmed execution, TOLEC-capable transfer, and lineage that survives agency transitions. Reporting should sync to control events. Move the original vault-to-vault on the real time transfer network (RTTN) so the bank’s software reads those events instead of a zip from contracts.

Ask Before the Next Novation

  1. Can you produce the novation package from vault custody without rebuilding from email?
  2. Do partner banks receive control events, or document dumps?
  3. Do change orders and assignments live on the same authoritative record?

Sources & references

  1. UCC § 9-105 — Control of electronic chattel paperSafe-harbor elements for a unique, identifiable authoritative copy and assignee identity.
  2. UCC § 9-330 — Priority of purchasers of chattel paperPurchase-money and good-faith purchaser priority contests often turn on possession/control facts.
  3. ANSI X9.110 (TOLEC) — Transfer of Location of Electronic ContractsIndustry standard for vault-to-vault transfer of electronic contracts while preserving § 9-105 control.
  4. ESIGN Act — 15 U.S.C. § 7001 et seq.Federal electronic-signature validity; does not by itself create UCC § 9-105 control.
  5. Alston & Bird summary — UCC Amendments (2022) revisions to Article 9Practitioner summary of § 9-105(c) and bundled-transaction clarifications.

Write support@safeclose.co to review novation custody against the asset the partner bank thinks it holds, vault control, and § 9-105.

Talk to our teamAll insights